Nah. To see the boom in the first photo, click on the words IMG-2528.jpg, which enlarges the full photo.
Here is what the defendant said in his deposition:
When the sail is fully raised and the main sheet tight, the boom slopes down about 12" at the foot. When the boom is in a level position, there is significant bagginess in the leach of the sail.
Defendant states that his boom, when mainsheet tight, slopes down.
Defendant further states that when boom is in a level position, leech is baggy. See Spirit Level photo, Exhibit B.
Prosecution contends that the defendant has altered the position of the boom in his Exhibit A (sail photo) so as to make it level, and that for this purpose he has used the Topping Lift.
And that he has, for some reason not shared in discovery, omitted all mention of said Topping Lift in his deposition.
Prosecution therefore requests a photo of the entire boom and sail unsupported by Topping Lift, backstay hook, or off-camera girlfriend .
The defense contention that the "sail is wrong" or "the dimensions incorrect" is a supposition arising from prejudice against droopy booms and obsolete sail designs, and seeks to impose a moral judgement not justified by changing taste or racing rules. A duck that walks like a goose may yet be a duck, the visual impression twisted by communem opinionem, the common expectation of what a duck-walk should look like. We have come further. We now know, all of us, that the only reliable duck identification is a rigorous anatomical examination which the court can hardly deny, and which can be easily provided by the defendant and owner of the duck, or yacht, in question.
Bailiff is to bring to the court the Original Poster, who was in the courtroom a minute ago and has apparently wandered off down the hall while the taxpayers stomp their feet for justice.