What's the conventional wisdom these days for an attention-getting device to have on a harness?
PLB is radio-beacon technology, time-tested (e.g., like an EPIRB) but not the greatest accuracy in a SAR scenario.
The new AIS-enabled PLBs might be interesting, but my understanding is that the US versions have to use the parent vessel's MMSI number, which may be confusing in a SAR scenario.
The satellite devices (like the Garmin InReach) seem interesting, two-way comms, real-time tracking for loved ones at home, and the ability to send a help-me signal... but I'm not sure I understand who would be listening/responding to that signal in a SAR scenario.
Any thoughts?
PLB is radio-beacon technology, time-tested (e.g., like an EPIRB) but not the greatest accuracy in a SAR scenario.
The new AIS-enabled PLBs might be interesting, but my understanding is that the US versions have to use the parent vessel's MMSI number, which may be confusing in a SAR scenario.
The satellite devices (like the Garmin InReach) seem interesting, two-way comms, real-time tracking for loved ones at home, and the ability to send a help-me signal... but I'm not sure I understand who would be listening/responding to that signal in a SAR scenario.
Any thoughts?