• Untitled Document

    The 2024-2025 Fund Raising Season has Opened!

    EricsonYachts.org has opened the season for raising funds to support the expenses of the site. If you would like to participate, please see the link below for additional information.

    Thanks so much for your continued support of EricsonYachts.org!

    2024-2025 Fund Raising Info

E38-200 replacement aft chainplate

Kenneth K

1985 32-3, Puget Sound
Blogs Author
The chainplate has to line up naturally before holes are drilled, and I think Ericson was casual about that in my case. If slightly askew when bolted down the strain isn't even on the steel.
If re-locating the holes to "line up" the chainplate, it's probably a good idea to check the rigging first to ensure the top of the mast is where it's supposed to be.

Also, a note to the owner, Eric: It looks like the chainplate screw heads have been messed with a bit (post #14) and the original backstay has been altered (post #1) with a Sta-Lok fitting (vs the factory swaged fitting). Might be worth getting the rig checked out if a previous owner made changes to it.
 
Last edited:

Pete the Cat

Sustaining Member
I think the most important thing, when reinstalling, is to insert the lowest bolt first, then tension the backstay. Or maybe the top bolt first, not sure it matters.

The chainplate has to line up naturally before holes are drilled, and I think Ericson was casual about that in my case. If slightly askew when bolted down the strain isn't even on the steel.
Rather than worry about the type metals, I would likely fill all the current holes with hi density filler and possibly look at the backing plate situation for improvement while it is all apart, and then follow Christian's advice. This is not a great design from Ericson or King, but they built boats to a price they eventually could not afford. Ideally you would anchor the backstay like you do a staysail stay; there would be a straight shot to a small bulkhead glassed to the hull. But that would be very expensive to pull off. And many production boats have funky arrangements like this so I think it is something for all of us to watch. Appears to my untrained eye that there was a serious flaw in the original metal--that gap looks like more than a crevice.
 

footrope

Contributing Partner
Blogs Author
I like the titanium idea, perhaps because I had my forestay chainplate duplicated (same thickness) in titanium back in 2017. No countersinks. It took a month, by Colligo Marine in Grover Beach, CA. Alignment, as mentioned in several posts, should be corrected if necessary.

Craig
 

Attachments

  • 20170719_203303-small.jpg
    20170719_203303-small.jpg
    113.5 KB · Views: 7
@Kenneth K - the sta lok was me. I just replaced all the standing rigging.

Update on my situation: I found a local welder to shore up my existing chainplate in the meantime. Going to go the titanium route, it's not much more expensive, and I'm sold on the efficacy of grade 5 Ti vs 316L.

Looks terrible, but strong enough (for now). For the new chainplate I intend to take 5° off the bend - like others here, mine does not match the angle to the masthead. I'm also going to get rid of the countersunk holes, and use grade 5 Ti bolts with stainless nuts.

Thank you all for your ideas, recommendations, and feedback. I really appreciate it.

1000036951.jpg
 
Top