GPS vs Celestial... new consideration

[N.A.]

Apparently there is now the possibility that GPS could be taken out not locally, but ocean-wide:

Tests suggest Russian satellites can jam GPS on a continental scale

Mystery of GPS interference across Europe raises questions about Russian motives.

arstechnica.com

Offshore I always carry a (plastic) sextant and the appropriate manuals, but... I don't really know how to use them. I think I might put a little more time into figuring that out before heading really far out.

Separately, I have become almost totally dependent on my chartplotter... not even bothering to log positions during day-trips. Even for local stuff outside the bay I think I will step up my log-keeping just so I can DR if need be / the fog comes in (as it can here.)

Everyone's risk profile will vary; mine was "I have 4 independent GPS sources on board, two of which have chart plotting... why do I need any further backup?" Considering current geopolitical uncertainties I think maybe a slight improvement in my backup plans wouldn't be a bad idea; I'll keep it simple though, since life is so much simpler just using the chartplotter : )

 

[Christian Williams]

Yes, GPS signal jamming or degrading is possible, and already apparent when sailing past bases near Point Conception, CA.

But wholesale degradation of GPS would disrupt or stop all civilian commerce, and is therefore a WW III scenario for which, it seems to me, a plastic sextant is not a likely solution. Nor is anything else.

 

[gareth harris]

There is an area of warfare known as the 'grey zone', which causes adversarial states difficulties while stopping short of WWIII. It has been growing around the world over the last few years, including hacking the computers of commercial firms, Russian oil tankers dragging their anchor chains over fibre optic connections on the sea bed, and Chinese warships sounding their sonars when Australian divers are down.

Since the signal from satellites in orbit is weak, it is fairly straightforward to transmit a stronger signal from the ground which is picked up by receivers and causes an erroneous GPS location. A encrypted code is transmitted from the satellites to military receivers which cannot be interfered with the same way, but trying to send commercial ships aground, or even cause airliners to crash, by distorting GPS could potentially become a grey zone act. Signals have been distorted in the vicinity of Ukraine, sometimes causing drones fired from Ukraine into Russia to be diverted to hit Latvia instead, and anybody sailing in the Baltic would to well to double check navigation. I am not aware of it being done elsewhere, but we need to keep its possibility in mind.

Beyond that, using a sextant will always gain respectability with old salts.

Gareth
Freyja E35 #241 1972

 

[bgary]

Offshore I always carry a (plastic) sextant and the appropriate manuals, but... I don't really know how to use them. I

If interested, I highly recommend David Burch's self-study textbook. Very good approach for working through the concepts and practices.

https://www.starpath.com/catalog/books/1887.htm

And while a plastic sextant will get the job done, it is not very precise. A "real" sextant doesn't have to cost a fortune - my Celestaire cost something like $800 and IMO is every bit as good for purpose as the more expensive Tamayas, Cassens-Plaths, etc (although I do wish I hadn't sold my Weems and Plath. Just because it was my partner for an awful lot of miles)

I still do celestial from time to time, just because I enjoy keeping the skills (somewhat current). Last summer on my vacation cruise I sat on the dock and confirmed that the Rosario Resort marina is, indeed, where the charts show it should be.

If truly interested, I have made some sight-reduction forms (based off but modified from Burch's) which - I think - make it harder to make simple errors when working the math.

$.02