Audiobooks? Yes, actors who read them do none of the production stuff. They just go to a studio and perform while an engineer monitors. It's a gig. My actor acquaintences don't enjoy it. Pay is low for the time spent. If some audiobooks annoy, and seem amateurish when the writer is famous, put that down to you get what you pay for. A good example of varying actor skills for famous authors is John Grisham--just listen to the samples of his books on Amazon. You'd think a guaranteed bestseller would merit superb voice actors. But ah! you'd have to pay them above scale. Welcome to the enlightened world of New York publishing, staffed by dinosaurs.
One example of how it should be done is Joe Morton reading Ralph Ellison's "Invisible Man." I'm sure he did it mostly as a labor of duty, since the novel is a milestone in the literature of the black experience.
Personally, I like control over things and to get hands dirty, something shared I have a hunch with almost everybody on this forum. So I do it all myself. The recording gear doesn;t cost much, and is no harder to learn than diesel maintenance or making boat instruments talk to each other. The performance? It is what it is. People like to hear the writer talk (polls show that). The post-production stuff is a real bear. It is very like varnishing. Prep, sand between coats, keep the work environment clean, pick a good day, and if you screw it up do it over. The ratio of performance to finished product is at least 1:5, and often more. That means for every hour of raw, five hours of post. Trapped in a dead room in headphones, squinting at a waveform.
These are mono voice recordings. Musicians like E32-200 sailor Rick Reynolds, who has a band, deal with multiple tracks, multiple takes, and an infinite array of choices on every cut. But people do that they themselves now, too--with a better technical result than Phil Specter dreamed off. It amazes me. It is also more work than anybody can imagine, because the possibilities are unlimited except by the artist, and if you have an idea you can make it happen merely by abandoning everything else in your life.
This whole topic interests me. We have in our hands today more pure potential than anybody could have guessed. An iPhone can shoot an entire movie, suitable for theaters--several directors have done it. My editing suite for the YouTube videos, Avid Pinnacle Studio 17, costs $69.95. It can do more than we could at Universal Studios with millions of dollars of gear. Want to write music? "Band in a Box" costs under $100. You can skip Julliard. You can skip the 20 years it took Dizzy Gillespie and Charlie Parker to create the new language of Bebop.
Formerly there were great barriers to technical knowledge, and unless you were Galileo the impediment to achievement was great.
Now anybody can make an audiobook. Or rebuild their Atomic 4 using not a wrench but Google. And all the stuff it took me so many years to figure out, like what the top batten looks like when twist is just right, is somewhere on the Internet, with video explanation by an expert.
Downside of all this potential is it makes you feel lazy.
Our grandfathers were tired, but they didn't feel lazy.
Well, of course I ought to be doing something else right now, so I guess I'd better do it. Or find some other way to put it off....