35-II's and little jibs
Well,
Phil is 100% correct on his placement, installation and observations about track length for this boat-this is eaxctly what we did on Providence-a well sailed 35 here in Chicago which I built a full Carbon sail inventory for (including a 105% for inside sheeting) before going into sailmaker recovery.
It does make a big difference in pointing and upwind VMG once you have 15 or so TWS.
For angles, 30 degrees apparent is pretty good for this boat-in very flat water and 15-18 TWS you might see 28, but that is about it, so you are doing well. Upwind speed will always be less than close or beam reaching speeds with any real breeze, and while I would have to check the polars to see exactly what speeds you should see in a given condition, if you are sailing only about .4-.5 knots slower when very close hauled you can't be doing too badly.
Remember that the Oceanis is a relatively modern design with a deeper keel and bigger rudder, and less relative wetted surface-so you can't expect to realistically sail upwind against them boat for boat in steady conditions. Same with the J109-which by the way is rated about 80 seconds/mile faster than the 35-II, so no surprise there.
To maximize upwind sailing, the 3 biggies are: inboard # 3 track, BS adjuster, and modified (deeper) rudder-none of these are very pricey, BTW.
Of course, decent sails make a HUGE difference, so don't underestimate the importance of them-they are your engine. You can't race your MG midget in SCCA successfully with poor cylinder compression, right?
Finally, PHRF (or any other rating) is NOT affected by track additions, and you do not have to report them. Changes in hull shape, rig dimensions or spin pole length, sail dimensions, keel or rudder shape, or ballast additions/subtractions are the main things you need to report and be subject to a rating adjustment for.
Sail safe,
S