Something we ran into, talking to two different riggers, was they would not replace the forestay without replacing the old, original furler. To our taste, it seemed to be working fine. They said we'd be calling them for a replacement in a few years. But, we're in the Northeast and practices may be different for you. FWIW - JeffHi starting to think about standing rigging replacements on our 1973 32'. Wondering about ballpark estimates if anyone has an idea (new area for me). We are in the SF Bay Area.
Firstly, Harken furlers(maybe most brands?) are not really designed to furl under heavy load. Even a furler that works effortlessly at the dock will struggle under load of 15kts at sea. How well does it work without a load at the dock ? The things you can check easily are halyard tension and the furler line condition and size. Brittle or worn fuzzy line will place a lot of resistance on the system. I also have found that the thinnest line I can comfortably handle (8mm for me) worked best. The last thing to check would be forestay tension, if it's too loose it will cause the foils to bow and.. well you get the picture. The 34-2 is a masthead rig so check that your backstay is tensioned to spec. Just my 2 cents sitting here on the couchseems to sometimes not want to turn, especially under load (wind often 20 kts around here, 15+ even downwind home) -- unsure exactly why. Always comes unstuck with enough force.
... that department store Brit-Com
Ahoy from Alameda!At the risk of restarting a dead thread, I have some related questions that seem maybe best placed here:
My (E34-2) standing rigging was replaced in 2016, nearly 10 years ago. Further, the Harken roller furler is now a bit balky; seems to sometimes not want to turn, especially under load (wind often 20 kts around here, 15+ even downwind home) -- unsure exactly why. Always comes unstuck with enough force. By itself, neither of these is enough to get me going, but... I would like to do more offshore, and the dream is Hawaii. I read somewhere that standing rigging should be replaced every 10 years, so that would be next year for me. A local boatyard said it would be ~ $10k after tax (pulling the mast, replacing all standing rigging), but I see @Bolo hit $17k, and on a smaller boat and possibly where labor rates are lower than the San Francisco area, and anyway, like him I'd replace all sheaves/blocks/basically anything in that mast when it was down. I also figure based on multiple comments above it would be smart to replace the furler at the same time, which would drive it up by $5k or so. Which brings me to:
--> How often do you replace standing rigging? At 10 years?
I don't remember seeing @Christian Williams mentioning doing this on his boats prior to his passages, but will admit to not having read all of the blog entries. Anyway, I don't want to be an idiot, but $20k is a lot. Curious what people do in terms of replacement interval.
PS: While I'm thinking about the furler, my boat falls at the top end of a Harken Mk IV Unit 1 and the low end of a Unit 2... given my problems with it furling under load, I would be inclined to go to the unit 2 on replacement. Is a larger furler best when it comes to a furling under load? Is Harken the go-to?
Any thoughts appreciated!
My original estimate (after an extensive rigging inspection which pointed out that the rigging had never been replaced on my 1987 boat) was less than $17k actually but I kept adding things to the job like repairing mast corrosion, replacing all of the halyards, wiring, new VHF antenna, anchor/deck lights, masthead unit, windex and more….in short everything except for the mast, spreaders and furler which was still working well so I saw no need for it’s replacement. On top of all that, Annapolis is not the cheapest place for marine services. I found that out when I priced out new cushions for the boat which led me to making my own. But considering my age, distance from the boat to my home, my inexperience with serious rigging, and wanting something that I could trust more in a big blow because my life could depend on it…I decided on using pros that I could complain to if things didn’t look, feel or work right after the job was done. That’s in fact what did happen resulting in three more trips up the mast. Of course there was no charge for those return visits.@Bolo hit $17k, and on a smaller boat and possibly where labor rates are lower than the San Francisco area, and anyway, like him I'd replace all sheaves/blocks/basically anything in that mast when it was down.