I really hate this model.
It has some merit, though.
Think of the simplest form of rudder. It generates (effectively) no lift, it works by deflecting water. Push the tiller, the rudder presents an angled obstacle to the flow of water, that deflection results in a force which moves the back of the boat. It could be argued that the whole purpose of the rudder is that deflection... and/or the redirected "thrust" that comes from the deflection. Providing an elegant NACA-section shape to the rudder enhances flow and reduces drag, but doesn't change the fact that it's the deflection and/or redirected thrust that does the work of turning the boat.
Kinda like Loren's example of holding a hand out the window of the car. Not an airfoil shape, but clearly holding the hand at an angle to the airflow deflects the air, which results in a net force.
Or something.
An exercise for the physicists.... take the same principle and apply it to a headsail. Air comes in at an entry-angle (call it 30 degrees) and gets deflected, coming off the back of the sail at an angle of ~0 degrees relative to the axis of the boat. Could that simple deflection be what matters? And can the resultingly redirected airflow, aft along the boat's axis, be considered "thrust", pushing the boat forward, with the keel taking care of the sidewards force...?
Bruce (somewhere in the dark recesses of my brain lurks the memories of how to draw a force-vector diagram...)