Hi All,
I am looking at the purchase of a 76 E27 and the survey
turned up the strangest thing. There appears to be a complete
void on the lower half of the keel below the encapsulated
ballast. This is forward of the bilge sump and runs the
entire length of the keel for the lower half on both sides.
The upper half is solid where the ballast meets the hull.
I found a reference to the ballast installation in the original
brochure stating: "2900 lbs of cast, shaped internal lead bonded
onto the lowest part of the keel", but there is no bond.
Could this be a step missed in production?? It has obviously
been there since production, I can't see the ballast having
moved up.
Anyone have any thoughts on this, is this intentional? It seems
to me that this would severely compromise structural strength,
not to mention that only the keel skin is there to resist an
impact with rocks!
Thanks for any input,
Angus,
Hopeful E27 owner.
I am looking at the purchase of a 76 E27 and the survey
turned up the strangest thing. There appears to be a complete
void on the lower half of the keel below the encapsulated
ballast. This is forward of the bilge sump and runs the
entire length of the keel for the lower half on both sides.
The upper half is solid where the ballast meets the hull.
I found a reference to the ballast installation in the original
brochure stating: "2900 lbs of cast, shaped internal lead bonded
onto the lowest part of the keel", but there is no bond.
Could this be a step missed in production?? It has obviously
been there since production, I can't see the ballast having
moved up.
Anyone have any thoughts on this, is this intentional? It seems
to me that this would severely compromise structural strength,
not to mention that only the keel skin is there to resist an
impact with rocks!
Thanks for any input,
Angus,
Hopeful E27 owner.