Having chased up those leads, these seem to be the options:
1. An electric engine, along the lines of the solomon technologies that Loren gave the link to, or the ozeco drive that Mark gave the link to. This would allow conversion to hydrogen cell fuel storage sometime down the road, most likely in the 5 year time frame. In the mean time, although generation from the prop under sail is an option, to carry enough batteries to motor all day into a breeze is not practical, so some kind of generation system would be needed, the overall cost probably more than diesel.
2. In a year or so, an engine that burns hydrogen may be on the market. I could not get a price projection, but the feeling was it would be comparable to a new diesel. Storing the hydrogen would be safer than propane, although there would still be safety concerns. The hydrogen could be created on board from energy generated by the prop under sail, or solar cells or a wind mill, so there would be no need to pull in to port for fuel, the system would also have to create very pure water, so the system would work very well for cruisers. Much quieter and cleaner than diesel.
There is potential for using this hydrogen for the stove, but nothing is on the market now - burning hydrogen is nigh impossible to see in daylight (one of the problems they had on Apollo 1) and there are not yet any safe systems for enclosed spaces in production.
3. The best solution, an electric motor powered using hydrogen fuel cell energy storage which regenerates through the prop under sail, with no need for batteries. Available now, price $300000.
Gareth
Freyja E35 #241 1972