Ralph Hewitt
Member III
Thanks, it will save me 15% of the CAFTA fee on import to Nicaragua.
EricsonYachts.org has opened the season for raising funds to support the expenses of the site. If you would like to participate, please see the link below for additional information.
Thanks so much for your continued support of EricsonYachts.org!
Please keep me in the loop, thanksUPDATE: We are about to push out the first CO request to the GICC, using @Alexa Jane as our test case. Once it's complete, I will advise the complete process, etc.
//sse
Not a stupid question at all. That was the very first use of this - for a USCG filing where it was specifically requested for a CA documentation, etc.Probably a Stupid Question-- will this have any usefulness for an owner wanting to document an Ericson-built boat that was never documented in the past?
Sean,Update:
Just spoke with the General Counsel for the Irvine Chamber and it would appear that they are interested in helping our community come to a resolution on this issue. I need to draft the documentation mentioned in my post above and then kick it back over to him for review. The main documents I have that I will be using are shown below. There is some production information missing on some of the models, so I will work to flesh this out from other sources.
If anyone has any other reference documents or info on the production runs, please let me know. We will be keying in on the serial numbered hulls for simplicity, however will also mention those very early production runs that failed to have them.
In the end, we should be able to produce a CO or something very close to it that overseas owners can use in the registration of their hulls. This documentation along with a more complete history of the production runs will also be complied into some general documentation that should reduce the incidence of new owners asking about HINs, etc.
Stay tuned, and let me know if you have other documentation - I will need it this week.
//sse
View attachment 38180